OAK GROVE, KY (CHRISTIAN COUNTY NOW) – During a special session of the Oak Grove Committee of the Whole on Thursday, June 28, committee members deliberated on two topics: allowing medical marijuana dispensaries within city limits and the presence of commercial vehicles in residential areas.
Under a new Kentucky law, medical cannabis dispensaries can open their doors in the state beginning Jan. 1. However, with the new law, the city can choose to allow these businesses, or they can opt out and create an ordinance preventing them from opening within city limits.
“I’ve heard from several people that allowing these businesses would be a positive thing,” Janet Edwards said.
Many committee members were in favor of allowing medical marijuana, citing that it would come with strict regulations, including the requirement for citizens to obtain approval from medical professionals before making purchases.
As the discussion ended, committee members unanimously expressed their intention to opt in for allowing medical marijuana in Oak Grove with plans to include it on a future City Council agenda.
Residents speak out
As for the presence of commercial vehicles in residential areas, Edwards said she had received feedback from three Oak Grove residents who expressed opposition to any changes to the zoning ordinance that restricts commercial vehicles in residential areas. The committee further discussed specific parts of the lengthy ordinance including abandoned or junk vehicles.
“Abandoned vehicles are eyesores,” said committee member Isaiah Spencer.
Committee member Jean Leavell pointed out that while the ordinance prohibits junked, wrecked or salvaged vehicles, the challenge lies in enforcing these regulations as they are frequently violated.
Tom Britton, with Community Services and Development, said ultimately it is up to the city to decide what makes the most sense for the community, taking note of the fact that many residents have take home vehicles.
The committee deliberated on several factors surrounding the topic, including safety, aesthetics and infrastructure durability. They unanimously decided to table to discussion and take no action, leaving the debated ordinance and its zoning regulations in affect.